A few years ago I had an enthralling discussion with an historian, a proponent of a federal model of national administration. In time, I have come round to this view of thinking. Obviously, the federal system does not work for all countries and states but there is much to be said for this system in the case of Poland.
Why a Federal Poland?
Poland desperately suffers from chronic centralisation. Poland’s current provinces lack the political clout to force through decisions that might have a direct influence on the situation within that area. The divisions put forward here are based on the historical regions of Poland which have been superimposed on the current provinces. The larger województwa or prowincje most importantly divide the population of the country into five roughly equal parts in terms of population. The future federal divisions would look something like this:
Pomorze (The Province of Pomerania)
Area: 65,397 km2
Population: 5,313,876
The new Province of Pomerania would include województwo zachodniopomorskie (West Pomeranian Province), pomorskie (Pomeranian Province) which is a logical step, but additionally it would be expanded by warmińsko-mazurskie (Warmian-Masurian Province) in order to bring money to this area.
![]()
Wielkopolska (The Province of Greater Poland)
Area: 61,780 km2
Population: 6,449,345
The new Province of Greater Poland would include most of the historical Wielkopolska covered by województwo wielkopolskie (Province of Greater Poland), lubuskie (Lubusz Province) and kujawsko-pomorskie (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Province).
![]()
Mazowsze (The Province of Mazovia)
Area: 73,996 km2
Population: 8,937,946
The new Province of Mazovia could be controversial bringing together województwo mazowieckie (Mazovian Province) and województwo łódzkie (Łódź Province). It would also include województwo podlaskie (Podlasie Province).
Śląsk (The Province of Silesia)
Area: 41,654 km2
Population: 8,658,881
The new Province of Silesia is not problematic from a historical point of view incorporating województwo dolnośląskie (Lower Silesian Province), śląskie (Silesian Province) and opolskie (Opole Province), however, local rivalries may make life difficult to begin with.
Małopolska (The Province of Lesser Poland)
Area: 69,857 km2
Population: 8,832,967
The new Province of Małopolska would incorporate województwo małopolskie (Province of Lesser Poland), świętokrzyskie (Świętokrzyskie Province), podkarpackie (Subcarpathian Province) and lubelskie (Lublin Province).
Equal Opportunities
The largest province in terms of area and population would be Mazowsze which includes Podlasie (in order to rejuvenate the area). The smallest province would be Silesia in terms of size and Pomorze in terms of population. The most important element in these new divisions would be the fact that poorer regions would be ‘tagged onto’ richer areas, for example, Podlasie joining Warsaw and Łódź, Warmia & Mazury would be attached to Pomorze and the Podkarpackie (Subcarpathian) and Lublin areas would adjoin Kraków.
Local Politics
Perhaps decentralisation would pull Polish politicians away from ‘big table’ politics and push them towards working directly with local authorities whose mandate would be fundamentally local. Poland has for many years suffered from fractious and fractured politics which have created a divisive political environment not conducive to cooperation and ironically, the spirit of solidarity.
March 4, 2008 at 7:33 pm |
What an interesting idea! I’ve just come from the launch of a new book about the past and future Krakow (where I live) and the debate was all about what needs to be done now to create a Krakow for the 21st century. All the ideas were top down – at no point did any of the luminaries talk about working with the inhabitants to shape the future. I found it quite sad. Anything that helps local government to be truly local would be a great thing.
March 4, 2008 at 7:59 pm |
Just an addendum:
A small step in the right direction, south of heaven.
Then we take Manhattan. Then we take Berlin.
March 5, 2008 at 7:03 am |
Ewa,
Thanks! A debate is most certainly needed.
Darth,
Nice one!
March 5, 2008 at 7:30 am |
Haven’t I been saying this for years? Next step, Euroregions; Silesia has more in common with Ostrava and the Czech filth belt than with Warsaw, and places like Zgorzelec/Görllitz would undergo an economic regeneration they both need… if they can overcome their historical antagonisms.
March 5, 2008 at 7:49 am |
Historical antagonisms always seem to be the problem. Your idealism is fine but I think if this kind of concept is to have any success we have to stay clear of the Euro-region rhetoric so as not to scare off the Joe Bloggs/Jan Kowalskis of this Euro-sceptical world. A federal Poland does not necessarily have to be a step towards a federal Europe.
March 5, 2008 at 8:54 pm |
And then of course there is The Province of Greater Britain
March 6, 2008 at 7:49 am |
Even though the idea of a United Europe is great, I am, more than ever, set against it because of the negativity that the United Europe debate seems to encourage.
March 11, 2008 at 10:20 pm |
hmm.. that’s an interesting idea. I am wondering what the people would say about that, e.g. if a referendum was conducted. I am afraid, most would be against any changes.. because this would be a HUGE change.. but we need it, right?
March 11, 2008 at 11:36 pm |
Most people would probably be against it, yes. But that’s why democracies don’t always work…
March 13, 2008 at 10:52 am |
aj don Łont to be in my Province! don’like my Nej… neighbours.
and specially Mr. Szafiak izn’t good for me…
a want go to Khasakstan! witk Borat!
and blame Canada!
March 13, 2008 at 1:19 pm |
March 13, 2008 at 1:20 pm |
Who’s Mr Szafiak?