When the destinies of Europe were mapped out at the conferences in Teheran, Yalta and Potsdam few could have envisaged a united Europe within the space of sixty years. Clear demarcated spheres of influence took shape during these conference and “from Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain descended across the Continent”. The Soviet sphere of influence shifted west as the countries of Eastern and Central Europe lost territory and new borders were drawn.
Post-war Division
One of the greatest and most controversial border changes was the annexation of the province of East Prussia by Poland and the Soviet Union. The northern section went to the Soviet Union with a far-northern slice of land known as the ‘Memel Territory’ going to the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic, the rest going to the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic. The southern section went to Poland. The problems that this created were unseen by many but the Soviet leaders had their motives for the creation of a Russian exclave sandwiched in between Poland and Lithuania.
Kingly Exclave
By all accounts, Stalin was intent on creating a buffer zone between the Baltic States and Poland in order to keep these newly acquired territories as far away from ‘the West’ as possible. He also believed that Königsberg, Kaliningrad as it was now renamed, was an invaluable strategic point (and port) for the Soviet Empire. To this day the Kaliningrad Oblast (affectionately known as Jantarny Kraj due to its rich deposits of amber) is Russia’s foot in the western door placing a wedge between the EU member states of Lithuania and Poland.
Annexation Again
During Boris Yeltsin’s reign, there was talk of the Kaliningrad Oblast being sold off to Poland. In fact, rumours abounded that Yeltsin himself had put this idea to the Polish government but the Poles were wary that this post-Soviet albatross would have a negative effect on an already frail economy. This mirrors a similar decision made by the Lithuanian SSR when the idea was mooted by Moscow high command for the Lithuanians to take formal control of Kaliningrad and the surrounding area. With both Poland and Lithuania within the EU and enjoying economic growth, now would be a good time for the EU to wash its hands of the ‘Russian exclave problem’. Rumoured plans are afoot for the EU to formally apply for jurisdiction of the area.
Divide and Conquer
The plan would be for the territory to be administered directly by Brussels (as Russia would never submit to either Poland or Lithuania). In return Russia would obtain vital concessions from the EU. The area would become known as the EU Free Port of Kaliningrad (the Russians stipulating no change of name). The initial plan would be to create an EU Hong Kong free trade area. However, in time the Lithuanians and Poles would gain control of the area with the territory being swallowed up by each state.
Dream or Nightmare?
The idea of wrestling Kaliningrad away from Russia would bring a communal sigh of relief from many EU negotiators, decision makers and especially the future EU Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Kaliningrad is a perpetual administrative nightmare for EU politicians. Should the residents of this territory be afforded transit visas or must they use regular visas? Should the denizens of Kaliningrad be seen as exterritorial Russians with limited rights within EU territory or simply Russians? The simplest answer to many of these problems would be to hand the territory over to Poland and Lithuania. Whether this happens or not is another problem.



May 25, 2008 at 8:28 am
On first reading, the plan for an EU administration sounds like by far the best solution. Yr points about Russia not wanting its historical adversaries to have jurisdiction, and the unlikelihood that they’d want to burden their economies with it anyway, are valid and convincing. There’s no EU precedent for it (unless you count Kosovo), but that doesn’t stop people from doing things for political expediency. The main snag wd be Putin - he’s too much of a nationalist to admit to even the slightest hint of loss of control. Maybe it’d be a chance for Medvedev to (at least appear to) ditch his puppet reputation?
May 25, 2008 at 11:53 am
No matter how much sense it might seem to make, I think a change in the status of the “exclave” is a total impossibility in the foreseeable future. Though Yeltsin agreed to negotiate re the Kuril Islands and Japan dangled yen, nothing happened. That was in a different era, when Russia was poor (”Burkina Faso with rockets”
and democratizing. Kaliningrad is yet more sensitive than the Kurils — a prize won in the Great Patriotic War, the central element of Russian/Soviet history, mythology, and propaganda.
May 25, 2008 at 3:57 pm
Jim, agreed - Putin could be the major hurdle.
Peteris, thanks for comment! It may sound impossible but stranger things have happened!
May 25, 2008 at 4:13 pm
Why not offer the Oblast (and the Polish part, if Poland would agree - for requsite compensation) to Germany?
Now, before the shouting starts or brickbats fly, let me add that the EU has a much larger hand in European state activites and, ultimately, will exercize at least a quasi (if not actual) control over its geographical area(s). Germany, which has gone from hated enemy, to pariah, to aspirant to democracy, to sheet anchor of European governance by parliamentary means, has several hundred years presence in the region — and a ton of interest in it.
Yes, the Soviets fought and bled mightily in the Great Fatherland War; so did the Germans and a host of other states. “”Yefrehtir Sokolov and Feldwebel Schmidt are very different soldiers today than their fathers were, 75 years ago.
“Never Again!” is better known in the Federal Republic than in the USA. Germany will never forget.
Germany, I think, would take on the assignment with gusto and can afford to repain the Oblast. What’s more, I believe the Germans would undertake bringing the region back to life eagerly.
If agreeable, the one immutable preconditiion?’
If permtted, war memorials would be combined facilities, with ALL war dead together.
May 26, 2008 at 5:10 am
Yes, the idea had crossed my mind. Again, the problem is a geopolitical one with the one political exclave being supplanted by another exclave. Russian becomes German albeit under EU jurisdiction. No, I think the only real way out of the problem would be for the territory to be divided between Poland and Lithuania.
May 26, 2008 at 1:07 pm
Why divide the area or hand it over to anyone when it could be made its own independent state? Bring back Prussia!
May 26, 2008 at 3:07 pm
That would be like creating a Kingdom of Cornwall, a Republic of Paris or a Grand Duchy of Saarland. Talk to any Prussians lately?
May 28, 2008 at 11:02 pm
[...] Uzar writes about the history of Kaliningrad region. Posted by Veronica Khokhlova Share [...]
June 4, 2008 at 10:06 pm
Somewhere I’ve always wanted to go, just because it’s one of those fascinating map oddities. Looks like I should get my skates on!
June 5, 2008 at 6:49 am
An oddity it certainly is. Island, I recommend you try Puńsk. What an oddity! A small town in the north-east of Poland where everyone is Lithuanian!
June 27, 2008 at 11:35 am
[...] list of what-ifs, maybes and perhapses. In a sense this post is related to a previous one (Królewiec Returns). The ‘what-ifs’ in history relate to different futures with each ‘what if’ [...]
July 2, 2008 at 12:38 am
There’s one little snag in this plan: Kaliningrad Oblast is inhabited overwhelmingly by Russian-speaking Eastern Slavs, and I suspect most of them would want to remain part of Russia, even though it’s hurting them economically. (Having said that, no-one has really asked them, so we don’t know what they’d say.) Most of them were born there, something they can hardly be blamed for, however appalling the history. In any case, let’s just say no side has much to be proud of when it comes to sudden demographic changes in that region.
If it weren’t for nationalist sentiment, I can think of all sorts of ways of rationalising Europe’s borders. In large part you could just abolish them altogether and reforge much of Europe as a single country, subdivided into more rationally-designed provinces. But I think people who are born and grow up in a territory, however their parents got there, have a right to a veto over any fundamental change in status.
July 2, 2008 at 7:31 am
Very true, Colin. The sad fact is, however, that most border changes are rarely consulted with the local population. I think a Europe of Regions would be an excellent idea. No more states but local areas. Regional patriotism, I think, is much healthier than nationalism. Thanks for the comments.